Lets be clear about something. Science isn’t decided by consensus. It’s decided by provable fact, by tests that produce the same results every time. Global Warming or Climate Change is based on computer models. The accuracy of computer models is based on the information entered into the study. Garbage in, garbage out. Computer models are so unreliable they aren’t admissible in court as evidence. A “consensus” is a majority of people agreeing on some hypothesis which means not all of them agree. Does that mean those that disagree are wrong or just outnumbered?
So who are the scientists that President Obama, Al Gore and most of the main stream media claim agree that man is causing Global Warming? It’s the IPCC….INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE. The IPCC is a United Nations panel, chosen and funded by the United Nations. The United Nations former Secretary General, Maurice Strong said, “Isn’t the only hope for the planet that the industrialized civilizations collapse? And isn’t it our responsibility to bring that about?” How better to collapse industrialized nations than to restrict their use of energy? After all our entire economy is based on the use of abundant, cheap energy. Considering that is their goal, who might they name as members of the IPCC? You’ll have a hard time finding the number of scientists in the IPCC or who they are. The number I’ve seen most often is around 600. We know who some of them are because they have spoken publicly. Some have appeared in documentaries to expose what they consider the fraud of Global Warming. But, understand, the 90% of scientists they are talking about are 90% of the 600 IPCC scientists NOT 90% of all the scientists in the world. But if man causing Global Warming were fact and all studies produced the same results wouldn’t 100% of scientists agree? There are over 31,000 scientists who signed a petition saying man was not causing Global Warming. This fact is never discussed by Al Gore, this administration or the media. Check for yourself http://www.petitionproject.org. These scientists are listed by name.
We know Phil Jones and Michael Mann were members. The computer model used is Phil Jones study. He was exposed in the Climategate e-mails to have manipulated data and intimidated peer publications not to publish studies that disagreed with his. He couldn’t give the date he based his model on because it was “not well organized enough”. We are going to reorder our entire way of living based on “not well organized” data that was admittedly manipulated? Jones resigned from the IPCC and his position at the University of East Anglia. He admitted that there had been “no statistically-significant global warming since 1995”. LOOK IT UP!
There is also Stephen Schneider. He is the scientist who said in 1974 that the world was going to freeze over by 2000 and we were all going to starve. Later he became a member of the IPCC and claimed man was causing the polar caps to melt and we were all going to drown. He appears in a documentary called “Cool It” about a young Danish environmentalist, Bjorn Lomborg, who believed if man was causing any warming it wasn’t catastrophic and could be adjusted to. Schneider condemned Lomberg in the documentary but says, “we have to give scary scenarios in order to get funding”. There you are.
When there is so much evidence that man has no effect on Global Warming or the climate, why won’t this administration, Al Gore and the media drop it and why do so many people believe it?
Well, it’s been demonstrated time and again, if you repeat a lie over and over people will believe it. The bigger the lie the more they believe it. Most people are responsible citizens and don’t want dirty air or water. Neither do I. But we have the cleanest air and water in the world. We have it because we have abundant energy to keep it clean. Coal plants have been developing ways to produce “clean coal” energy but this administration is closing down our coal plants instead of letting them developing their technology. At the same time China is building a new coal plant everyday with no such concerns about “clean coal”. Coal produces 45% of our energy needs. 45% of our energy is being shut down with NO viable replacement. And, BTW, the making of solar panels and wind turbines uses more energy and produces more waste than they save. They are also much more expensive and less reliable. The general public knows next to nothing about science, so it is understandable that when they are constantly being told they are causing the end of the world they would fear for their children’s futures. The trouble is, it’s not true.
There have been great advances in the technology in Nuclear power. Liberals scared us out of building anymore Nuclear plants (Thank you, “Clear and Present Danger”) when it is the safest and cleanest energy. The technology has advanced to the point it is possible to burn 100% of the fuel rods which solves the problem of what to do with the waste. In the over 60 years we have had Nuclear power, there have been three incidents and fewer deaths than any other form of energy. But we aren’t building Nuclear plants. No, the ONLY plan is regulating CO2. Why?
Another goal of the United Nations is redistribution of wealth. The money we are throwing at wind and solar (mostly to foreign nations) is a good start. So is our giving money to other countries to drill for oil in our Gulf and promising to be their first customer….while not allowing us to drill. The United Nations goal is world wide Economic, Social and Environmental Equality. They believe the only way to raise the standard of living of third world countries is to lower ours. How could they get us to go along with that unless they made us believe our lifestyle was destroying the world? The bigger the lie the more people believe it.